Main Menu
Main Menu
The clinical protocol plans to preset three dose groups, namely 1×10⁷ cells per dose, 3×10⁷ cells per dose, and 6×10⁷ cells per dose. The injection will be administered once every three weeks, adopting a "3 + 3" dose escalation design. The dosing interval is based on the pharmacokinetic (PK), safety and preliminary efficacy data of MT027 investigator-initiated trial (IIT) previously conducted at Dushu Lake Hospital of Soochow University. Accordingly, it is recommended to maintain the dosing interval of once every three weeks, with a window period of ±7 days. According to past experience, the dosing cycle should be at least 6 cycles, with each cycle lasting 21 days. If patients...
This is an open label, multicenter, phase II study evaluating the activity and safety of pembrolizumab combined with cisplatin/carboplatin and etoposide as first line treatment in patients with advanced MCC.
Little is known about the evolution of genetic and epigenetic changes that occur in the progression of glioma. We inferred the evolution trajectories of matched pairs of primary tumors and progression tumor in situ fluid (TISF) based on deep whole-genome-sequencing data (ctDNA). A monocentric, Gene grouping controlled trial design was used to select patients. and to compare gene evolution of different subtypes of glioma under therapy. To predict the molecular reaction of bevacizumab treatment, clarify the mechanism of drug resistance of bevacizumab treatment.
The purpose of the current study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE plus octreotide long-acting release (LAR) versus octreotide LAR alone in newly diagnosed patients with somatostatin receptor positive (SSTR+), well differentiated Grade1 and Grade 2 (G1 and G2) (Ki-67 <10%) advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) with high disease burden
Glioblastoma is recognized as the most common and aggressive form of primary malignant brain tumor, with treatment options that are limited and prognosis that is extremely poor, showing median progression-free survival of 12 months and median overall survival of less than 18 months. Surgical resection plays a critical role in the treatment, with the extent of resection significantly impacting patient outcomes. Historical approaches to surgical resection have evolved, moving from radical strategies to more conservative ones that aim to preserve normal brain function while removing the tumor as completely as possible. Recent studies have suggested that increasing the extent of...
The investigators carried out a multi-center comparative study, involving hospitals including the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, West China Hospital, Wenzhou First Hospital, and Li Huili Hospital. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of medication and surgery for specific subtypes of microadenomas and clearly defined macroadenomas (Knosp grades 0-2), in order to determine which is more effective and which has fewer benefits, thereby enhancing the evidence base.
To assess the morbidity and mortality in low grade glioma patients following surgical management.
The goal of this observational study is to learn about surufatinib in Refractory Metastatic G3 Neuroendocrine Tumors. The main questions it aims to answer are: - To evaluate the efficacy and safety of surufatinib in the treatment of second-line and posterior-line in G3 neuroendocrine tumors. - To explore the predictive value of blood perfusion parameters in curative effect. Participants will be given surufatinib 300mg QD, po, every 4 weeks as a course of treatment, continuous administration until PD, death or intolerable toxicity.
The purpose of this study is to determine: 1. The highest dose of the trial intervention that targets neuroendocrine tumors and is tolerated by patients. 2. The highest frequency of dosing of the trial intervention that targets neuroendocrine tumors and is tolerated by patients. 3. The highest dose and frequency of dosing of the trial intervention that targets neuroendocrine tumors with at least the same degree of effectiveness and tolerability as currently available (standard of care) treatments for patients with neuroendocrine tumors.
At present two studies (SWOG S1801 and NADINA) have demonstrated superiority when using neoadjuvant treatment compared to adjuvant treatment only, but no studies have compared PD-1 monotherapy (SWOG 1801 regimen) to the PD-1/CTLA-4 combination (NADINA regimen) therapy. The SWE-NEO study aims to compare these two regimens, where the PD-1/CTLA-4 combination is potentially more effective, but also associated with more side effects.
