Glioblastoma is the most aggressive primary brain tumor due to its highly infiltrative growth pattern, strong proliferative potential, and multiple mechanisms of resistance to treatment . Based on results from multicenter studies, English oncologist Roger Stupp proposed in 2005 a new treatment approach involving initial tumor resection followed by conformal external beam radiation therapy combined with temozolomide, plus subsequent cycles of monochemotherapy with this drug. This approach extended median survival by only 2 months, yet remains the standard of care due to lack of better alternatives. Consequently, recent protocols for malignant CNS tumors in Russia and internationally recommend prioritizing clinical trial enrollment over "standard" treatment. Numerous studies demonstrate that the extent of resection of contrast-enhancing GB volume on MRI positively correlates with progression-free and overall survival. This is explained by the fact that adjuvant chemoradiation methods and the body's immune responses show efficacy only with small residual tumor volumes. The interval between surgery and adjuvant therapy negatively correlates with survival outcomes, potentially because the mitotic cycle of GB stem cells lasts only 24 hours. From this perspective, intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) may improve treatment results. Attempts to use various IORT technologies for malignant brain gliomas span several decades. Some studies reported better survival with IORT compared to controls, but most involved small patient groups without reliable resection control or dosimetric assessment due to technological limitations. Early IORT methods used bulky linear accelerators producing high-energy electron beams. With portable systems, renewed interest emerged first in breast cancer, then neurosurgery. Neuroimaging and software now enable precise treatment planning. Bensaleh S. et al. evaluated balloon brachytherapy (MammoSite®) for early breast cancer in 2009. The device featured a dual-lumen catheter with a balloon inserted into the resection cavity. After contrast inflation and CT planning, 192Ir delivered 34 Gy in 10 fractions over 5 days to 1 cm depth. While comparable to conventional radiotherapy in 3-5 year survival, the 16% infection rate from prolonged implantation was a major drawback. A case report described using a similar breast cancer system (Contura balloon applicator) for recurrent malignant glioma in a 47-year-old patient. A single 20 Gy fraction showed no complications at 6-month follow-up. The Zeiss INTRABEAM system uses a miniature 50 kV linear accelerator with rigid spherical applicators producing low-energy x-rays for high surface doses with limited penetration. The 2018 INTRAGO phase I/II trial by Giordano et al. evaluated dose escalation (20→40 Gy) in 15 newly diagnosed GB patients. No complications (wound healing issues, bleeding, ischemia, or radionecrosis requiring surgery) occurred. Median PFS was 17.7 months (95% CI 9.7-25.9) in protocol-compliant patients, with distant progression remaining challenging. A recent advancement is electronic brachytherapy using the Xoft Axxent eBx System, combining a 50 kV x-ray source with a silicone balloon applicator conforming to resection cavities. Initially successful in breast and gynecologic cancers, its application expanded to neuro-oncology. In 2016, the European Medical Center (EMC) initiated a pilot study using Axxent eBx for recurrent GB post-standard chemoradiation. Twenty-nine patients received 20 Gy to the balloon surface after maximal safe resection. Median OS was 28.7 months (range 14-104) from first surgery. In patients with ≤2.5 cm³ residual tumor (n=16), median local PFS was 14.5 months (8-94), with 6- and 12-month PFS rates of 68.9% and 31% respectively. One grade 3 radionecrosis case occurred (CTCAE), with no infections or CSF leaks. Study Rationale:
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Healthy volunteers are participants who do not have a disease or condition, or related conditions or symptoms |
No |
Study Type
An interventional clinical study is where participants are assigned to receive one or more interventions (or no intervention) so that researchers can evaluate the effects of the interventions on biomedical or health-related outcomes. An observational clinical study is where participants identified as belonging to study groups are assessed for biomedical or health outcomes. Searching Both is inclusive of interventional and observational studies. |
Interventional |
Eligible Ages | 40 Years - 75 Years |
Gender | All |
Trial ID:
This trial id was obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov, a service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health, providing information on publicly and privately supported clinical studies of human participants with locations in all 50 States and in 196 countries. |
NCT07141732 |
Phase
Phase 1: Studies that emphasize safety and how the drug is metabolized and excreted in humans. Phase 2: Studies that gather preliminary data on effectiveness (whether the drug works in people who have a certain disease or condition) and additional safety data. Phase 3: Studies that gather more information about safety and effectiveness by studying different populations and different dosages and by using the drug in combination with other drugs. Phase 4: Studies occurring after FDA has approved a drug for marketing, efficacy, or optimal use. |
Phase 1 |
Lead Sponsor
The sponsor is the organization or person who oversees the clinical study and is responsible for analyzing the study data. |
Joint Stock Company European Medical Centre |
Principal Investigator
The person who is responsible for the scientific and technical direction of the entire clinical study. |
Aleksey Krivoshapkin, Professor M.D. |
Principal Investigator Affiliation | Joint-Stock Company European Medical Center |
Agency Class
Category of organization(s) involved as sponsor (and collaborator) supporting the trial. |
Other |
Overall Status | Not yet recruiting |
Countries | |
Conditions
The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. |
Glioblastoma |
This trial has no sites locations listed at this time. If you are interested in learning more, you can contact the trial's primary contact:
Evgeniy Avetisov
For additional contact information, you can also visit the trial on clinicaltrials.gov.