Comparing Cosmetic Outcomes: Endoscopic vs. Conventional Craniotomy for Frontal Skull Base Lesions

Study Purpose

This research study will compare the cosmetic outcomes, specifically scar assessment and complications, between two surgical approaches for treating frontal skull base lesions: the endoscopic supraorbital eyebrow craniotomy and the conventional frontal craniotomy. The study will aim to evaluate the differences in scar appearance, spread, erythema, suture marks, hypertrophy/atrophy, and overall impression between the two approaches using the Scar Cosmesis Assessment Rating (SCAR) scale. Additionally, it will examine patient-reported outcomes such as itch and pain. The study will follow a structured protocol, including random allocation to groups, preoperative assessments, surgery, postoperative follow-ups, and statistical analysis. It will emphasize the importance of understanding cosmetic outcomes to improve patient satisfaction and inform treatment regimens.

Recruitment Criteria

Accepts Healthy Volunteers Healthy volunteers are participants who do not have a disease or condition, or related conditions or symptoms	No
Study Type An interventional clinical study is where participants are assigned to receive one or more interventions (or no intervention) so that researchers can evaluate the effects of the interventions on biomedical or health-related outcomes. An observational clinical study is where participants identified as belonging to study groups are assessed for biomedical or health outcomes. Searching Both is inclusive of interventional and observational studies.	Interventional
Eligible Ages	25 Years - 65 Years
Gender	All

More Inclusion & Exclusion Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Patients having frontal skull base lesion on MRI. 2. Lesion size <5cm on MRI with IV contrast. 3. Both male and female. 4. 25-65 years of age.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Patients with redo surgery (on medical record) 2. Lesion size >5cm. 3. Vascular tumors. 4. Previous trauma. 5. Anticoagulant medications. 6. Comorbidities(uncontrolled hypertension and diabetes) 7. Skin diseases

Trial Details

Trial ID: This trial id was obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov, a service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health, providing information on publicly and privately supported clinical studies of human participants with locations in all 50 States and in 196 countries.	NCT06417658
Phase Phase 1: Studies that emphasize safety and how the drug is metabolized and excreted in humans. Phase 2: Studies that gather preliminary data on effectiveness (whether the drug works in people who have a certain disease or condition) and additional safety data. Phase 3: Studies that gather more information about safety and effectiveness by studying different populations and different dosages and by using the drug in combination with other drugs. Phase 4: Studies occurring after FDA has approved a drug for marketing, efficacy, or optimal use.	N/A
Lead Sponsor The sponsor is the organization or person who oversees the clinical study and is responsible for analyzing the study data.	University of Health Sciences Lahore
Principal Investigator The person who is responsible for the scientific and technical direction of the entire clinical study.	N/A
Principal Investigator Affiliation	N/A
Agency Class Category of organization(s) involved as sponsor (and collaborator) supporting the trial.	Other
Overall Status	Not yet recruiting
Countries
Conditions The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied.	Brain Tumor

Additional Details

The proposed research study will undertake a comparative analysis of the cosmetic outcomes associated with two distinct surgical approaches utilized in the treatment of frontal skull base lesions: the endoscopic supraorbital eyebrow craniotomy and the conventional frontal craniotomy. This investigation will primarily focus on evaluating scar assessment and complications arising from these surgical procedures. 1. Surgical Approaches: The study will compare two different techniques: the endoscopic supraorbital eyebrow craniotomy, which is a minimally invasive neurosurgical procedure involving a small incision within the eyebrow to access anterior skull base pathologies, and the conventional frontal craniotomy, a traditional approach involving a larger incision. 2. Purpose: The primary objective will be to assess and compare the cosmetic outcomes, particularly scar appearance and related complications, between these two surgical methods. The emphasis will lie on evaluating parameters such as scar spread, erythema, suture marks, hypertrophy/atrophy, and overall impression using the Scar Cosmesis Assessment Rating (SCAR) scale. 3. Study Protocol: Random Allocation: Patients will be randomly assigned to either the endoscopic supraorbital eyebrow craniotomy group or the conventional frontal craniotomy group. Preoperative Assessment: Comprehensive preoperative evaluations will be conducted to ascertain baseline data and ensure suitability for surgery. Surgery: Patients will undergo the assigned surgical procedure based on random allocation. Postoperative Follow-up: Close monitoring of patients post-surgery to assess scar healing and detect any complications. Data Collection: Data regarding scar assessment, complications, patient-reported outcomes, and other relevant parameters will be collected at specified intervals. Statistical Analysis: Rigorous statistical analysis of collected data will be conducted to draw comparisons and conclusions regarding cosmetic outcomes between the two surgical approaches. 4. Patient-Reported Outcomes: In addition to clinician-assessed scar parameters, the study will also consider patient-reported outcomes such as itch and pain, providing a comprehensive understanding of the patient experience following these surgical interventions. 5. Significance: The study will underscore the significance of evaluating cosmetic outcomes in neurosurgical procedures, aiming to enhance patient satisfaction and inform treatment decisions. By comparing the two surgical approaches, the research will seek to contribute valuable insights that may lead to the refinement of surgical techniques and improved patient care. Overall, this proposed research endeavors to offer a detailed examination of the cosmetic results associated with endoscopic supraorbital eyebrow craniotomy versus conventional frontal craniotomy, thereby facilitating informed decision-making and optimizing patient outcomes in the management of frontal skull base lesions.

Arms & Interventions

Arms

Experimental: Endoscopic Supraorbital Eyebrow Craniotomy

his minimally invasive neurosurgical procedure accesses brain tumors by making a small incision within the eyebrow, providing access to pathologies of the anterior skull base. Compared to traditional frontal craniotomy, this approach aims to minimize tissue disruption, potentially reducing postoperative complications and improving cosmetic outcomes. The procedure involves precise surgical techniques guided by endoscopic visualization, allowing for targeted tumor resection while preserving surrounding healthy tissue. Additionally, the use of smaller incisions may lead to reduced scarring and faster recovery times compared to conventional approaches.

Active Comparator: Conventional Frontal Craniotomy

This arm represents the standard surgical approach for treating frontal skull base lesions. In this arm, surgeons perform the craniotomy through a conventional frontal approach rather than the endoscopic supraorbital eyebrow approach. This arm serves as the comparator against the experimental arm to evaluate the differences in cosmetic outcomes, scar assessment, and complications between the two surgical techniques.

Interventions

Procedure: - Endoscopic Supraorbital Eyebrow Craniotomy

The Endoscopic Supraorbital Eyebrow Craniotomy is a minimally invasive neurosurgical procedure used to access and remove brain tumors located in the anterior skull base region. In this approach, surgeons make a small incision within the eyebrow area to gain access to the underlying pathology, avoiding larger incisions and more extensive tissue disruption associated with traditional open craniotomies.

Procedure: - Conventional Frontal Craniotomy

The Conventional Frontal Craniotomy is a traditional surgical approach used to access and treat lesions located in the frontal region of the skull base. In this procedure, surgeons make a single or multiple large incisions in the scalp overlying the frontal bone to gain access to the underlying pathology.

Contact Information

This trial has no sites locations listed at this time. If you are interested in learning more, you can contact the trial's primary contact:

For additional contact information, you can also visit the trial on clinicaltrials.gov.

Clinical Trial Finder