Determining Postoperative Recovery and the Impact of Adverse Events in Neurosurgery Based on Self-reported, App-based Longitudinal Assessment - a Collaborative Observational Research Project

Study Purpose

Analyzing the impact of surgery and adverse events (AEs) on patients' well-being is of paramount importance as it provides essential information for benefit-risk assessment. Current methods in outcome research are static, resource-intensive and subject to missing-data issues. Moreover, AEs are inconsistently reported using various grading systems that usually do not account for patients' subjective well-being. These are severe drawbacks for outcome research as it hinders monitoring, comparison, and improvement of treatment quality. The increasing use of smartphones offers unprecedented opportunities for data collection. We developed a free smartphone application to assess fluctuations of patients' well-being as a result of surgical treatment and possible AEs. The application is installed on each patient's smartphone and collects standardized data at defined timepoints before and after surgery (well-being, AE description and severity). By acquiring longitudinal patient-reported outcome before and after neurosurgical interventions, we aim to determine the regular postoperative course for specific surgical procedures, as well as any deviation thereof, depending on the occurrence and severity of AEs. We will evaluate the validity of existing AE classifications and, if necessary, propose a new patient-centered scheme. We hope that this will result in an increase in standardized reporting of patient outcome, and ultimately allow for evidence-based patient information and decision-making.

Recruitment Criteria

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Healthy volunteers are participants who do not have a disease or condition, or related conditions or symptoms

No
Study Type

An interventional clinical study is where participants are assigned to receive one or more interventions (or no intervention) so that researchers can evaluate the effects of the interventions on biomedical or health-related outcomes.


An observational clinical study is where participants identified as belonging to study groups are assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.


Searching Both is inclusive of interventional and observational studies.

Observational
Eligible Ages 18 Years and Over
Gender All
More Inclusion & Exclusion Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • - Age ≥ 18 years.
  • - The patient must be able to consent.
  • - The patient is willing to provide data upon one year after surgery.
  • - The patient possesses and is capable of using a smartphone (Android or iOS operative systems) - The patient has the necessary language and cognitive skills to use the smartphone app.
  • - The patient is scheduled for one of the defined operations (see above for both spinal and cranial) and in a stable, non-life-threatening situation (admitted to the regular ward or intermediate care unit (IMC)) - Baseline preoperative SWI and QoL assessment is possible (minimum requirement is one assessment, the latest the day before surgery)

    Exclusion Criteria:

    - Pregnancy.
  • - Foreseeable difficulties using the smartphone or smartphone app.
  • - The presence of a condition that hinders the baseline preoperative assessment.
- Health conditions that render inclusion unsafe (e.g., untreated ruptured intracranial aneurysm or congestive heart failure; in general, all patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU))

Trial Details

Trial ID:

This trial id was obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov, a service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health, providing information on publicly and privately supported clinical studies of human participants with locations in all 50 States and in 196 countries.

NCT06352710
Phase

Phase 1: Studies that emphasize safety and how the drug is metabolized and excreted in humans.

Phase 2: Studies that gather preliminary data on effectiveness (whether the drug works in people who have a certain disease or condition) and additional safety data.

Phase 3: Studies that gather more information about safety and effectiveness by studying different populations and different dosages and by using the drug in combination with other drugs.

Phase 4: Studies occurring after FDA has approved a drug for marketing, efficacy, or optimal use.

Lead Sponsor

The sponsor is the organization or person who oversees the clinical study and is responsible for analyzing the study data.

Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen
Principal Investigator

The person who is responsible for the scientific and technical direction of the entire clinical study.

N/A
Principal Investigator Affiliation N/A
Agency Class

Category of organization(s) involved as sponsor (and collaborator) supporting the trial.

Other
Overall Status Recruiting
Countries Switzerland
Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied.

Disc Disease, Instabilities Lumbar, Brain Tumor, Aneurysm
Additional Details

Understanding and analyzing the impact of surgery and adverse events (AEs) on the subjective well-being of patients is of paramount importance as it provides objective information that may be useful in a risk-benefit discussion. Current methods in outcome research are static, resource-intensive and subject to missing-data issues. This results in a poor understanding of the normal postoperative course which in turn prevents consistent reporting of AEs as they are usually defined as a deviation thereof. As an additional challenge and because there is no consensus and/or recommendation on this subject, AEs are graded using various classifications that neglect the impact of AEs on the subjective well-being of patients. For example, the most used AE grading system is the therapy-based Clavien-Dindo-Grading system (CDG, doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae), which fails to detect the severity of AE that are not treated by means of pharmacotherapy and/or surgery. This is an important limitation as new neurologic deficits are frequent AEs that may imply dramatic consequences on quality of life but are considered as low grade in therapy-based grading systems such as the CDG. Other classifications were developed specifically for neurosurgery but they suffer the same limitations. Recently, our group proposed the Therapy-Disability-Neurology Grade (TDN, doi:10.1093/neuros/nyab121) to address this problem. The TDN grade takes into account the therapy used to counteract AEs (as does the CDG), the associated neurologic deficits, and the resulting disability, but currently lacks widespread use and validation. These are severe drawbacks for outcome research as it hinders monitoring, comparison, and improvement of quality of the treatment delivered. The increasing use of smartphones across all age groups offers unprecedented opportunities for data collection. We have created a smartphone application (app) to assess patient well-being in a standardized and longitudinal fashion. The app named "Op-tracker app". It collects longitudinal, self-reported data (subjective well-being rated from 0 to 10) at fixed time points before and after surgery. Additional information such as type of disease, type of surgery (currently four categories), AE description and severity (according to the CDG and TDN grade) is also recorded, along with a standardized quality of life (QoL) questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). A simplified version recently described in a feasibility study showed good acceptance and no major technical issues (doi:10.1007/s00701-021-04967-0). With this innovative technique of data acquisition, we will gather a higher density of data using less resources than traditional methods. In a prospective observational pilot study without intervention using the "op-tracker app" to acquire longitudinal patient reported outcome measures (the subjective well-being index, SWI) before and after surgery, we aim to determine the regular postoperative course for certain surgical procedures as well as the deviation thereof depending on the severity of specific AEs. We will evaluate the validity of existing AE severity grading systems and if necessary, propose a classification more consistent with the subjective well-being of patients. This will greatly benefit patient information by providing essential insight about standard and complicated postoperative course. Beyond the benefit this new data will add to the scientific literature, we hope that the app will improve daily patient care by enabling early detection of and reaction to AEs in case of "pathological decrease" in self-reported well-being and QoL. Should this be confirmed, the app could be widely used and its scope could be extended to the whole neurosurgical spectrum or even to further surgical subspecialties. We anticipate that this will result in an increase in standardized reporting of patient outcome and ultimately in a more evidence-based patient information and decision-making.

Arms & Interventions

Arms

: Lumbar decompression, including single- or multiple-level procedures

: Lumbar transpedicular instrumentation and fusion, including extension to thorax/pelvis

: Supratentorial craniotomy for tumor, vascular or other pathology

: Infratentorial craniotomy for tumor, vascular or other pathology

Interventions

Other: - OP-Tracker App

There will be no study-specific therapeutic intervention. The OP-Tracker App will be downloaded and installed on the patient's smartphone. Preoperative assessment: baseline factors such as age, gender, medical conditions, type of disease and of surgery, EQ-5D-5L. Before and after surgery surgery, SWI (Quality of life) will be assessed daily using "pop-ups"; the patient will input the value (0-10) using a slide-bar. After completion of the surgery, the app will automatically modify the number of SWI assessments over time according to the occurrence of AEs. At any point in time, the patient will be able to register an AE in the smartphone app. The patient can select the AE via a drop-down menu in the app, and can additionally input free text in case of an AE of type "other". Using a further drop-down menu, the patient will classify the AE according to the CDG and TDN grade. QoL assessments (EQ-5D-5L questionnaire) will pop up before, and at 3 and 12 months after surgery.

Contact a Trial Team

If you are interested in learning more about this trial, find the trial site nearest to your location and contact the site coordinator via email or phone. We also strongly recommend that you consult with your healthcare provider about the trials that may interest you and refer to our terms of service below.

International Sites

Kantonsspital St.Gallen, St.Gallen, Switzerland

Status

Recruiting

Address

Kantonsspital St.Gallen

St.Gallen, , 9007

Site Contact

Linda Bättig, MD

[email protected]

+41 71 494 11 99

Stay Informed & Connected