Clinical Trial Finder

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Age between 18-75 yrs. 2. World Health Organization (WHO) Performance Status 0 or

• I. 3.

50% or less histologically or cytologically confirmed unresectable metastatic uveal melanoma in the parenchyma of the liver. 4. Hepatic metastases, confined to or predominantly in the liver. 5. No prior systemic treatment (including chemotherapy, vaccine therapy, monoclonal Ab treatment, IL-2) 6. Local pre-treatment of uveal melanoma metastases is allowed (resection and/or thermal ablation), except for chemotherapy containing procedures (e.g. chemoembolization) and radio-embolization, and as long as patients have progressed with measurable disease according to RECIST 1.1. 7. No concurrent systemic immunosuppressive medications ≥ 10mg/day prednisone or equivalent. Topical, inhaled, nasal and ophthalmic steroids, and adrenal replacement therapy are allowed. 8. Screening laboratory values must meet the following criteria: WBC ≥ 2.0x109/L, Neutrophils ≥ 1.0x109/L, Platelets ≥ 100 x109/L, Hemoglobin ≥ 6.5 mmol/L, Creatinine ≤ 2x ULN, AST ≤ 2.5 x ULN, ALT ≤ 2.5 x ULN, Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 X ULN, INR and PTT in normal range, LDH < 2xULN. 9. Women of child bearing potential (WOCBP) must agree to use a reliable form of contraceptive as described in paragraph 5.4. 10. Men must agree to the use of male contraception as described in paragraph 5.4. 11. Absence of additional severe and/or uncontrolled concurrent disease. 12. No prior, or ongoing other malignancy, except adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer, cervical cancer in situ or adequately treated other cancer with eradicative intent for which the patient has been continuously disease-free for > 2 years. 13. No aberrant vascular anatomy of the liver that precludes PHP.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Cerebral or meningeal metastasized uveal melanoma. 2. Subjects with any active autoimmune disease or a documented history of autoimmune disease, or history of syndrome that required systemic steroids or immunosuppressive medications, except for subjects with vitiligo or resolved childhood asthma/atopy; 3. Prior immunotherapy (tumor vaccine, cytokine, or growth factor) 4. Known history of infection with Human Immunodeficiency Virus; 5. Active infection requiring therapy, positive serology for Hepatitis B surface antigen or Hepatitis C ribonucleic acid (RNA) 6. History of congestive heart failure, active cardiac conditions, including unstable coronary syndromes (unstable or severe angina, recent myocardial infarction), significant arrhythmias and severe valvular disease must be evaluated for risks of undergoing general anesthesia. 7. History or evidence of clinically significant pulmonary disease e.g. severe COPD that precludes the use of general anesthesia. 8. Underlying medical conditions that, in the Investigator's opinion, will make the administration of study treatment hazardous or obscure the interpretation of toxicity determination or adverse events; 9. Latex allergy, and known hypersensitivity/allergy to ipilimumab, nivolumab, melphalan or heparin. 10. Prior Whipple's Surgery. 11. Concurrent medical condition requiring the use of immunosuppressive medications, or immunosuppressive doses of systemic or absorbable topical corticosteroids; 12. History of or current immunodeficiency disease, splenectomy or splenic irradiation; prior allogeneic stem cell transplantation; 13. Patients who are unable to be temporarily removed from chronic anti-coagulation therapy. 14. Patients with active bacterial infections with systemic manifestations (malaise, fever, leucocytosis) are not eligible until completion of appropriate therapy. 15. Use of other investigational drugs before study drug administration for systemic malignancy. 16. Pregnancy or nursing

Uveal melanoma (UM) is an uncommon malignancy (0.6-0.7 cases/100.000/year) that, in the case of metastatic stage, has a poor prognosis for response to treatment and survival. It is remarkable for its purely hematogenous pattern of dissemination, most commonly to the liver (60%) and lungs (25%). Current approaches using percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP) with melphalan resulted in response rates of up to 40% in the liver (1, 2) (for results of our own phase II study see paragraph 6.3.2). However, a main part of the patients developed extrahepatic disease in the follow-up, whereas the liver metastases were mainly stable. Checkpoint inhibitors have been shown to improve overall survival in metastasized cutaneous melanoma in phase III studies (3-6), but seem to have limited activity as monotherapies in metastasized uveal melanoma (7-9). The combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab has achieved 2 out of 6 patients PR in a retrospective analysis (10). Interestingly, both patients had a liver-directed therapy (SIRT and chemoembolization) before the immunotherapy. Combination of radio-frequency ablation (RFA) and anti-CTLA-4 enhanced antigen-loading of dendritic cells, and induced long-lasting anti-tumor immune responses in a murine melanoma model without induction of any severe side effects (11, 12). A phase Ib/II trial by Blank et al. (13) showed unconfirmed responses in some patients when RFA was combined with ipilimumab in uveal melanoma, but long-term disease stabilization was not achieved. Most of the responses were seen in extrahepatic metastases. Combining percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP) with checkpoint inhibitors could together lead to control of hepatic and extrahepatic disease. Therefore, we propose the current trial: Phase1b/2 Study Combining Hepatic Percutaneous Perfusion with Ipilimumab plus Nivolumab in advanced Uveal Melanoma (CHOPIN).

Arms

Experimental: Phase Ib

Active Comparator: Phase II - Combination treatment

Active Comparator: Phase II - PHP

Interventions

Drug: - Ipilimumab and nivolumab

The effect of ipilimumab and nivolumab has previously been tested in metastatic uveal melanoma. In this study the combination with percutaneous hepatic perfusion will be performed in order to evaluate the effect.

Drug: - Melphalan chemosaturation via percutaneous hepatic perfusion

The effect of ipilimumab and nivolumab has previously been tested in metastatic uveal melanoma. In this study the combination with percutaneous hepatic perfusion will be performed in order to evaluate the effect.